Click here for sitemapSitemap
About
AAR Radio Frequency
Positive Train Control
Multimedia
Facility
Test Tracks
Green Technologies
Laboratories
Rail Dynamics Laboratory
Transportation Security
AAR Intermodal Interchange
Intermodal Interchange Rules
IIR Appendix F
IIR Feedback Form
IIR Online Registration
AAR Publications
Publications
TTCI Annual Report
AAR Publications
Services
TTCI Services Overview
Engineering Services
Vehicle Performance
Vehicle Performance Overview
PB Track Geometry
Truck Perfromance Detector
TADS
Instrumented Wheelsets
InteRRIS®
Computer Modeling
Computer Modeling
Asset Management
Passenger Rail
Instrumentation
Rail Defect Facility
Transportation Security
Transportation Security
AAR Official Website
SERTC Official Website
TTCI SERTC Promo
AAR Radio Frequency
AAR Radio Frequency
Migration Schedule
Migration Schedule Info
Migration Management Login
Contact Jim Reimer
Wheel Rail Management
WWM Part One
WWM Part Two
WWM Part Three
WWM Part Four
AAR Tank Database
AAR Tank Car Database
AAR TTD Discontinued
AAR RADIO FREQUENCY - Migration Information
tri-mode radios?
designators to your licenses.
Migration Information
- FAQ's
- Submit A Question
- FCC Documents
What exactly is narrowband?
Current wideband channels are 25 kHz wide and are spaced 15 kHz apart. The FCC is requiring both the bandwidth and the spacing be cut in half resulting in 12.5 kHz channels spaced at 7.5 kHz.
Why is narrowbanding required?
It is an FCC mandated rule that is intended to increase the number of usable voice channels. In practice, however, it appears that the narrowband emissions of two channels, 7.5 kHz apart, may overlap and cause worse interference than existed at wideband with 15 kHz separation. This is partly why the railroads have decided to avoid the use of 7.5 kHz separation or use of the interstitial channels for narrowband.
If my current channel takes up the space of two narrowband channels, will I get two narrowband channels for my one wideband channel?
No, the new channels will be treated as new channels and will have to be applied for and coordinated as any other channel.
Will I get to keep the same channels I have?
Yes, for now. The AAR and the member railroads are working on a plan for re-allocating channels to reduce interference and to increase the total number of usable channels in congested areas.
Will I lose range when I switch to narrowband?
Initial tests have shown very little, if any, change in range.
When are the mandate timelines?
July 1, 2010 is the date the railroads have voluntarily decided as the date when all locomotives will be narrowband capable. That will give them six months to catch any locomotives they may have missed.
January 1, 2011 is the date that wideband applications or modifications will no longer be accepted. All new applications or modifications must be for narrowband or very narrowband.
January 1, 2013 is the date when wideband operation will no longer be permitted.
What happens if I don’t migrate?
The FCC has said that as of January 1, 2013, it will cancel all licenses that do not have narrowband or very narrowband emissions on the license.
What if the other railroads I talk to migrate before I’m ready, or I migrate before they are ready?It is important that you coordinate your migration to narrowband with the other railroads you talk to.
Can I keep my current radios?
If your radios are capable of narrowband analog operation, there is no need to replace them to meet the 2013 narrowband deadline. However, in order to distinguish between wideband and narrowband on the same frequency, the railroads have decided to add a leading zero to the narrowband channel number. Thus, channel 52 is wideband and 052 is narrowband on the same frequency. If your radios cannot display leading zeros, you may want to replace them anyway.
Does it matter which narrowband radio I buy?It appears that in narrowband mode, most radios are compatible. However, the FCC has stated that narrowband is just an intermediate step to very narrowband but has not set a date yet when that will be required. The AAR recommends that all new radios purchased be very narrowband (NXDN) compatible.
What is very narrowband?
Very narrowband is the requirement to transmit one voice channel per 6.25 kHz of spectrum. Because all very narrowband radios are digital, it is also defined as 4800 bps of data per 6.25 kHz channel width. There are several technologies available that accomplish this goal, but the railroads have selected NXDN technology primarily because there are multiple vendors supporting it.
With the FCC saying narrowband is just an intermediate step to very narrowband, will I have to switch to very narrowband in a few more years?
The FCC generally gives about 10 years notice before requiring a new technology, but it is better to purchase very narrowband radios as old radios are replaced than to have to replace all the radios at one time. In addition, migrating to very narrowband sooner will make more channels available.
How much does it cost?
The AAR Frequency Coordination office will add narrowband and/or very narrowband emissions to all frequencies on the license for $85. If other information on the license must also be updated, the fee will be $135. The FCC charges $60 for a modification. The FCC is also allowing licensees to change a wideband emission to narrowband for the modification charge of $60 without going through a coordinator as long as no other technical changes are requested or required. A change from wideband to narrowband will require operation on narrowband.
In this Third Memorandum Opinion and Order and Third Further Notice of Proposed RuleMaking and Order (“Third MO&O,” “Third Further Notice,” and “Order,” respectively), we address eighteen petitions for reconsideration of the rules adopted in the Second Report and Order in this proceeding to promote migration to narrowband (12.5 kHz) technology in the private land mobile radio (PLMR) services...
By this Public Notice, the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau (Bureau) accepts and approves the consensus analytical method for determining whether Private Land Mobile Radio (PLMR) applications “trigger” the additional frequency coordination requirements of Sections 90.35(b)(2)(iii) and 90.175(b) of the Commission’s Rules. This consensus analytical method was recommended by the Commission’s certified frequency advisory committees (“FACs” or “coordinators”) for PLMR spectrum...
By this action, we resolve many of the technical issues which have inhibited private land mobile radio (PLMR) users from employing the most spectrally-efficient technologies. Specifically, we adopt extensive rule changes to the PLMR services 1 which will promote highly effective and efficient use of the PLMR spectrum and facilitate the introduction of advanced technologies into the private mobile services...
On June 15, 1995, the Commission adopted the Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rule Making hi PR Docket No. 92-235' which provides the private land mobile radio (PLMR) community with a regulatory framework that promotes efficient use of spectrum, increases technical flexibility, enhances the deployment of new technologies, and promotes a competitive and robust marketplace for product development...
Our primary goal in this proceeding has been to address the increasing communications requirements of the private land mobile radio (PLMR) community by developing a strategy for encouraging more efficient use of PLMR spectrum below 800 MHz - i.e., those PLMR Services within the 150-174 MHz, 421-430 MHz, 450-470 MHz,
and 470-512 MHz bands...
This Third Memorandum Opinion and Order (MO&O) addresses petitions for reconsideration and related pleadings concerning the rules governing trunked operation in the Private Land Mobile Radio (PLMR) bands below 800 MHz that were adopted in the Second Report and Order (Second R&O) in the captioned proceeding. In this MO&O, we adopt new standards for consent by certain existing licensees when applications are filed for trunked operation on shared spectrum below 800 MHz...
On July 7 and 9, 1999, respectively, MRFAC, Inc. (MRFAC) and Forest Industries Telecommunications (FIT) requested that the Commission stay the effective date of recent amendments to Sections 90.35 and 90.175 of the Commission's Rules until the issues raised in their petitions for reconsideration are addressed. For the reasons stated herein, the requests are granted...
This Second Memorandum Opinion and Order (Second MO&O) clarifies certain decisions in the Second Report and Order (Second R&O) in PR Docket No. 92-235, and, where necessary, makes appropriate modifications to the rules...
In this Report and Order, we adopt changes to Part 90 of the Commission's Rules that were either proposed in or suggested in response to the Notice of Proposed Rule Making (Notice) in this proceeding. The Notice, adopted on September 30, 1998, proposed rule changes that were intended to further consolidate and streamline the Part 90 rules...
This Fifth Memorandum Opinion and Order (Fifth MO&O) addresses petitions for reconsideration or clarification and related pleadings regarding certain of our decisions in the Second Memorandum Opinion and Order (Second MO&O) in this proceeding...
This Sixth Memorandum Opinion and Order addresses two substantially identical Further Petitions for Clarification and/or Reconsideration filed by the Alarm Industry Communications Committee of the Central Station Alarm Association (AICC) and by the law firm of Blooston, Mordkofsky, Dickens, Duffy and Prendergrast...
By this Notice of Proposed Rule Making ("Notice"), we commence a proceeding to implement Sections 309(j) and 337 of the Communications Act of 1934 ("Communications Act"), as amended by the Balanced Budget Act of 1997 ("Balanced Budget Act"), which was signed into law on August 5, 1997...
In this Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rule Making, we adopt rules and policies to implement Sections 309(j) and 337 of the Communications Act of 1934 (“Communications Act”), as amended by the Balanced Budget Act of 1997 (“Balanced Budget Act”), which was signed into law on August 5, 1997...
In the Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rule Making (“R&O” and “FNPRM” respectively) in this proceeding,1 the Commission, inter alia, sought comment on certain proposals to promote new spectrum-efficient technology...
Before us are four requests to stay the effectiveness of a rule adopted in the Second Report and Order and Second Further Notice of Proposed Rule Making (Second Report and Order) in this proceeding...
In this Third Memorandum Opinion and Order and Third Further Notice of Proposed Rule Making and Order (“Third MO&O,” “Third Further Notice,” and “Order,” respectively), we address eighteen petitions for reconsideration of the rules adopted in the Second Report and Order in this proceeding to promote migration to narrowband (12.5 kHz) technology in the private land mobile radio (PLMR) services...
In the Second Report and Order and Second Further Notice of Proposed Rule Making (Second Report and Order and Second Further Notice, respectively) in this proceeding,1 the Commission sought comment on requiring certain private land mobile radio (PLMR) licensees to transition to 6.25 kHz technology...
In the Third Report and Order in this proceeding, the Commission indicated that it intends to establish a fixed timeline for private land mobile radio (PLMR) licensees to transition to 6.25 kHz technology, but did not at that time establish specific dates...
This Public Notice reminds interested parties of the Commission’s deadlines for private land mobile radio services in the 150-174 MHz and 421-512 MHz bands to migrate to narrowband (12.5 kHz or narrower) technology...
In the Third Report and Order in this proceeding, the Commission indicated that it intends to establish a fixed timeline for private land mobile radio (PLMR) licensees to transition to 6.25 kHz technology, but did not at that time establish specific dates...
This Public Notice reminds interested parties of the Commission’s deadlines for private land mobile radio services in the 150-174 MHz and 421-512 MHz bands to migrate to narrowband (12.5 kHz or narrower) technology...
FCC designated AAR Frequency Coordinator:
-
James Reimer
Transportation Technology Center, Inc.
55500 DOT Rd.
Pueblo, CO 81001
Phone: 719-584-0514
What's New
-
TTCI's Stabler stresses quality, reputable railroad research at Colorado R&D facility
PUEBLO, Co. --The Transportation Technology Center Inc.’s (TTCI) primary function is to conduct thorough research on products that can help railroads operate more safely, reliably and efficiently... read more
-
TTCI and Colorado State University-Pueblo announce MS degree in Engineering
PUEBLO, Co. -- A new Master of Science (MSE) degree in Engineering with emphasis areas in mechatronics and railroad engineering will be offered by Colorado State University-Pueblo beginning next fall... read more
-
ASCE recognizes TTCI in winning project
Pueblo, Colo. Led by Principal Engineer Duane Otter.... read more..
TTCI receives UIC's Global Rail Research and Innovation Award for highest score in the category of "Rail Freight."
(Paris, 11 December 2012). The inaugural UIC Innovation and Railway Research Awards were held in Paris on 11 December, during celebrations to mark the 90th anniversary of the International Union of Railways (UIC).
-
Sen. Mark Udall and Rep. Scott Tipton
Pueblo, Colo. Rep. Scott Tipton and Sen. Mark Udall are both lobbying congressional committees this month to guarantee that Pueblo's Transportation Technology Center, Inc., continues to get research funding in the 2013 federal budget...
-
Cong. Tipton Presents Award to TTCI
Pueblo, Colo. TTCI was awarded the Export Achievement Certificate by the U.S. Commercial Service, Department of Commerce's International Trade Administration for being an international leader in railroad technology, security, and testing...



